Mapping the Geography of Stroke Care

The Stroke Access Score is a research tool built to quantify geographic inequity in access to stroke-certified hospitals across California — and to examine how that inequity intersects with race, income, and clinical risk.

The Hypothesis

Time-to-treatment is the single most critical determinant of stroke outcome. A patient receiving clot-busting therapy within 60 minutes of stroke onset ("golden hour") is dramatically more likely to survive without disability than one who arrives later. The location of certified stroke centers is therefore not an abstract planning concern — it is a life-and-death variable.

Urban proximity bias in U.S. hospital siting means that rural, low-income, and minority communities are systematically farther from certified stroke centers — and that this geographic inequity compounds the clinical stroke risk factors already concentrated in those same communities.

This project tests that hypothesis empirically for every ZIP code in California using drive-time data, Census demographics, and CMS hospital quality ratings as a proxy for stroke certification capability.

How the Score Works

The SAS uses a CSC-weighted scoring model with 15-minute drive time increments. Comprehensive Stroke Centers are weighted heavily as the only facilities capable of mechanical thrombectomy. Primary Stroke Centers provide modest mitigation only. TSC has been removed — it was assigned by CMS proxy, not authoritative certification data. LA County EMS recognizes only CSC and PSC.

Drive Time CSC Score PSC Score
0–15 min10040
15–30 min8532
30–45 min6524
45–60 min5016
>60 min258
No certified facility00

For each ZIP code, the SAS score is the highest score across all hospitals in the drive-time cache — reflecting the best certified facility realistically reachable. A ZIP with CSC access within 15 minutes scores 100; one with only a PSC more than 60 minutes away scores 8.

0–39
Low
40–59
Med-low
60–69
70–100
High

Scoring Models

The site includes two scoring models, selectable via the toggle in the navigation bar. Both use only CSC and PSC tiers — TSC is not a recognised EMS destination category in California and is excluded from both models.

The Primary Model is the default and is recommended for all general-purpose use. The Sensitivity Model is a research comparison tool — it isolates the methodological effect of switching from two-threshold flat penalties to 15-minute increments. It is not an alternative clinical recommendation.

Primary Model

Default

CSC-weighted, 15-minute drive time increments. Developed with James Beavis RN BSN SCRN (Cedars-Sinai).

Drive TimeCSCPSC
0–15 min10040
15–30 min8532
30–45 min6524
45–60 min5016
>60 min258

Sensitivity Model

Research

Same tiers, flat penalties at two thresholds. Use to compare against the Primary Model's 15-minute increment structure.

Drive TimeCSCPSC
0–30 min10050
30–60 min7035
>60 min5520

Vulnerability Flags

Three flags identify ZIP codes where poor access intersects with community-level risk factors.

SEV — Socioeconomic Vulnerability

SAS score < 40, majority-minority community, AND poverty rate > 20% or uninsured rate > 15%.

CRF — Clinical Risk Factor

SAS score < 40, AND median age > 40 — indicating elevated population-level stroke risk.

Double Jeopardy

Both SEV and CRF flags are active — communities facing simultaneously poor access and high stroke risk burden.

Data Sources

Coverage

Statistics computed live from the scoring dataset.

California ZIP codes scored statewide
of 312 LA County ZIP codes scored
(9 excluded — non-residential)
341 LA County hospitals in dataset
LA County — limited access (0–39)
LA County — moderate access (40–69)
LA County — strong access (70–100)

Limitations & Caveats

About the Authors

JB
James Beavis RN BSN SCRN
Registered Nurse — Hypothesis, clinical methodology, and stroke care domain expertise
MM
Mike Morales
Data pipeline, geographic analysis, and visualization